ancient China and India, voluntary techniques were first documented
which, when used, kept natural ejaculation from occurring
-- and thus, also kept the refractory period from occurring,
as well. These ejaculation-stopping manuevers are what allow
men to mimic the true multiple orgasms women experience. Of
course, these techniques come at a cost. And that cost
is, ironically, pleasure.
of the latest of these books to rehash and capitalize on these
millennias-old techniques is "The Multi-Orgasmic Man"
(Chia & Arava, 1996). These same techniques
can also be found in "Any Man Can" (Hartman &
Fithian, 1984), "How to Make Love All Night"
(Keesling, 1994), and all other books on the subject,
both modern and ancient.
brief summary of the ancient ejaculatory-control techniques
contained in "The Multi-Orgasmic Man", along with an
insightful review of this book, can be found at www.sexuality.org.
the above-referenced website, the unidentified author of the
review prefaces his/her remarks with an erudite critique of
the philosophical Taoist premise upon which these techniques
'The Multi-Orgasmic Man' takes a few steps outside of its
grounding in sex research is in its approach to ejaculation.
This book advances the argument that ejaculating is
bad for men's overall health, and suggests enjoying non-ejaculatory
multiple orgasms so that pleasure may be enhanced AND so
that ejaculation may be avoided. In support of
their argument that ejaculation is bad for health, the
authors cite 1) a study that showed a certain species
of male worm lives longer if it doesn't ejaculate, 2)
that men get tired after orgasm, and 3) that ancient
Chinese Taoist practitioners thought ejaculation was bad
for overall health.
hits the heart of my major criticism of this book. The
authors don't make the case that the worm studies carry
over into humans, and in fact fail to cite any evidence
that (say) celibate people live longer than cassa novas
also don't show that getting tired (post ejaculation) affects
*long-term* health. What the authors do instead
is to continually repeat that ejaculation is bad for health
because 'ancient Taoist masters said it was.' Unless
you're already inclined to Taoism, you're unlikely to find
these arguments about ejaculation to be very convincing."
For more information
on male "multiorgasmic" ejaculatory-control techniques
via the Internet, we highly recommend the website www.sex-project.com
a Useful Option, These Techniques Shown to Inhibit
1989, Dr. Prakash Kothari conducted a comprehensive scientific
study on a "multiorgasmic" male using these ejaculatory-control
found that as a direct result of the use of these techniques...
... "The intensity of orgasmic pleasure is reduced
in (male) multiorgasm."
the entire quote here)
course, revealing this fact does not sell books, which is
why only here will you find the truth.
The True Issue, not Ejaculation ...
these techniques do provide men a potentially valuable option
to the stereotypical one-orgasm-per-erection scenario, they
do require that men sacrifice the full pleasures of orgasm
so as to prolong their erections.
time that men in general, and science in particular, realize
that MRP is the true issue, not ejaculation and its natural
and very real pleasures. And now that the conquest
of MRP has finally been documented,
it's time we realized that the True Male Sexual Potential
is far greater than has ever before been imagined.